All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrik Jonsson <patrik@ucolick.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:25:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E6DDCD.7090007@ucolick.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060206035759.GB25631@sam.triumf.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]

Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>Does anyone have an actual formula?
> 
> 
> I doubt it, because it requires measuring lifetimes, which takes
> years, by which time the data are useless because the disks you used
> are obsolete.

I found this article on drive reliability from Seagate:

http://www.digit-life.com/articles/storagereliability/

They do indeed model the temperature derating as an exponential, such
that 25C is the reference temp and at 30C the MTBF is reduced to 78%.
Running the drive at 40C gives you half the lifetime.

Can't find anything about spinup/down though, but they do talk about how
MTBF depends on power-on hours per year, which should be a correlated
quantity. They assume the MTBF goes *up* the fewer POH/yr the drive has,
there's never any reduction due to excessive spinup/down, or at least
the reduction is never dominant. They also talk about the effect of duty
cycle.

cheers,

/Patrik

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-06  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-02  5:59 RAID 16? David Liontooth
2006-02-02  6:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-02-02  8:34 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 16:17 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 16:28   ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-02 16:54     ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 20:24       ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 21:18       ` J. Ryan Earl
2006-02-02 21:29         ` Andy Smith
2006-02-02 22:38         ` Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-03  2:31           ` Ross Vandegrift
2006-02-03  2:54         ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-02 18:42   ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-02-02 20:34     ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-03  0:20     ` Guy
2006-02-03  0:59       ` David Liontooth
2006-02-02 16:44 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2006-02-03  9:08   ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2006-02-03  2:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-05 23:42   ` Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running David Liontooth
2006-02-06  3:57     ` Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-06  5:25       ` Patrik Jonsson [this message]
2006-02-06  4:35     ` Richard Scobie
2006-02-06 10:09     ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-06 16:45       ` David Liontooth
2006-02-06 17:12         ` Francois Barre
2006-02-07  8:44           ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2006-02-07 19:18           ` Neil Bortnak
2006-02-06 19:22     ` Brad Dameron
2006-02-06 21:15     ` Dan Stromberg
2009-09-20 19:44   ` RAID 16? Matthias Urlichs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43E6DDCD.7090007@ucolick.org \
    --to=patrik@ucolick.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.