From: Manish Kathuria <manish@tuxspace.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] load balancing and failover
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:34:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EB5028.4030206@tuxspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060209115810.GA6970@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com>
Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi,
> A friend of mine has 2 lines of 512kbps terminated in two Linux boxes.
> He now want to remove those 2 boxes and have some device which will
> loadbalance the two ISPs and also have a failover arrangement. But he
> has agreed to give me a chance to do it on Linux for my own
> satisfication.
> Is this easy to do with lartc? How do I go about it exactly? I have
> very less time to do it since his whole network will be done for that
> time and I cannot afford to play for long time. Is it worth trying it
> with lartc for academic sake atleast?
> Can someone suggest some easy steps?
> With warm regards,
> -Payal
> p.s. Is lartc.org down?
You can try out implementing configuring a load balancing and failover
system referring to the following documents:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/dgd-usage.txt
You will need to patch and recompile the linux kernel using the "routes"
patch given at http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes for dead gateway detection
to work.
The load balancing part works fine but dead gateway detection (and hence
failover) does not work always. It works best when your first hop
gateway is down but may or may not work when a subsequent hop is down.
In a recent case, I observed that dead gateway detection and the
failover was working very well when one ISP failed but did not happen
when the other one went down. So you can try your luck here.
--
Manish Kathuria
http://www.tuxspace.com/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-09 11:58 [LARTC] load balancing and failover Payal Rathod
2006-02-09 14:34 ` Manish Kathuria [this message]
2006-02-09 14:40 ` Payal Rathod
2006-02-09 15:19 ` Manish Kathuria
2006-02-09 15:34 ` Payal Rathod
2006-02-09 15:53 ` gypsy
2006-02-11 9:08 ` Sandro Dentella
2006-02-11 18:11 ` Jason Boxman
2006-02-12 17:27 ` Sandro Dentella
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-19 14:34 [LARTC] Load " hare ram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43EB5028.4030206@tuxspace.com \
--to=manish@tuxspace.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.