From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FtdWVsIETDrWF6IEdhcmPDrWE=?= Subject: Re: Where is CONNMARK extension kernel 2.4.32? Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: <43EB601C.5000007@arcoscom.com> References: <43C0F61F.4030400@arcoscom.com> <43C2A451.1020509@arcoscom.com> <43C4003B.9080400@freesco.pl> <43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com> <43C4E50B.2040909@freesco.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43C4E50B.2040909@freesco.pl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" To: Mac!eKs Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org What about the reinclusion of these patches into patch-o-matic-ng for kernels 2.4.x? And about add them into kernel mainline (as in 2.6.x kernels)? Regards Mac!eKs wrote: > Samuel Díaz García napisał(a): >> The last pom-ng tested by me where the 20051231 and I'm sure the >> CONNMARK isn't into it. > > Because in snapshots _newer_ then 20050918 there's no CONNMARK, string, > TTL. > >> Could any netfilter guy re-add these patches into pom-ng for the 2.4 >> kernels? Or, better, talk with kernel guys to add them into 2.4 mainline? >> >> What do you think about this propose? > > I agree :) > > -- Samuel Díaz García Director Gerente ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L. CIF: B11828068 c/ Romero Gago, 19 Arcos de la Frontera 11630 - Cadiz http://www.arcoscom.com mailto:samueldg@arcoscom.com msn: samueldg@arcoscom.com Móvil: 651 93 72 48 Tlfn.: 956 70 13 15 Fax: 956 70 34 83