All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Schipper <jschipper@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Isolated CPU, SMI problems an thoughts
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:49:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EB80BC.1060403@domain.hid> (raw)

Hello,
I'm new to this list but have in the past used RTAI in a single 
processor off the shelf solution. I'm looking to switch to native 
Xenomai api but have a general problem...
  The problem is SMI on new systems, and other latency killers that 
sometimes are not controllable by software always popping up when trying 
to migrate to a newer platform.  Can a dual core processor using 
isolcpus, preemp-rt and xenomai effectively future proof agains smi/chip 
set issues (specificly AMD or Intel dual core solutions) by isolating a 
cpu for exclusively xenomai/realtime use?

Some background information: 
  The realtime software I've developed in the past (with RTAI/adeos in 
user space) is a simple high speed serializer driver (mmap) to 
communicate with outside hardware and is responsible for syncronizing 
(with a semaphore/mutex) a linux process (soft realtime) at ~60Hz.  The 
realtime process is periodic at 1.2Khz or 2.4Khz and calculates/filters 
the data before sending commands back down the serializer interface and 
to the linux process for soft realtime network access.

  Generally we like to use "off the shelf" business PC's (Dell 170's and 
Dell 270's, HP 5000 with 1Gig memory) and find that 20-30us latency is 
achievable.  We use "off the shelf" hardware because availability 
(recieve within a week) and low cost are desired.   Whenever looking for 
an alernative solution either availablity or cost becomes a show 
stopper.  I'm open to suggestions and invite anyones thoughts on the 
subject.

Thanks for your time !

JKS




             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-09 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-09 17:49 John Schipper [this message]
2006-02-09 18:19 ` [Xenomai-core] Isolated CPU, SMI problems an thoughts Jan Kiszka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-09 20:16 John Schipper
2006-02-11  1:09 ` Max Krasnyansky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43EB80BC.1060403@domain.hid \
    --to=jschipper@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.