All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:07:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EBF56F.7090507@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E044F0914@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>

Moore, Robert wrote:
> The next thing that would be useful is to know what method(s) are
> executing when the message pops out.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Luck, Tony
>> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:16 PM
>> To: Moore, Robert; 'linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org'
>> Cc: 'linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org'
>> Subject: RE: some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620)
>>
>> But I goofed and muddled up my two problems.  I tried
>> booting on my zx1 ... which was broken altogether by
>> recent acpi changes.
>>
>> Getting back to the rx2620 ... deleting those lines makes
>> no difference.  I still boot ok, I still see the unaligned
>> access messages.
>>
>> /proc/acpi/dsdt for that system attached.
>>
>> -Tony

I also got kernel missalignment errors..., unfortunately also
a lot of slab debugger errors until the machine rebooted, so
I didn't care too much about the missalignments, but these
could have the same cause?

I now could nail the mem
corruptions down to ACPICA-20051021 by binary search.
It's late, maybe I got something wrong, but I am quite sure the
culprit lies there.

The patch is huge, but maybe it's just one of the other pragmas or
whatever related?:

grep pragma ../ACPICA_20051021.patch
+#pragma pack(1)
+#pragma pack()
+#pragma pack(1)
+#pragma pack()


     Thomas

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:07:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EBF56F.7090507@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E044F0914@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>

Moore, Robert wrote:
> The next thing that would be useful is to know what method(s) are
> executing when the message pops out.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Luck, Tony
>> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:16 PM
>> To: Moore, Robert; 'linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org'
>> Cc: 'linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org'
>> Subject: RE: some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620)
>>
>> But I goofed and muddled up my two problems.  I tried
>> booting on my zx1 ... which was broken altogether by
>> recent acpi changes.
>>
>> Getting back to the rx2620 ... deleting those lines makes
>> no difference.  I still boot ok, I still see the unaligned
>> access messages.
>>
>> /proc/acpi/dsdt for that system attached.
>>
>> -Tony

I also got kernel missalignment errors..., unfortunately also
a lot of slab debugger errors until the machine rebooted, so
I didn't care too much about the missalignments, but these
could have the same cause?

I now could nail the mem
corruptions down to ACPICA-20051021 by binary search.
It's late, maybe I got something wrong, but I am quite sure the
culprit lies there.

The patch is huge, but maybe it's just one of the other pragmas or
whatever related?:

grep pragma ../ACPICA_20051021.patch
+#pragma pack(1)
+#pragma pack()
+#pragma pack(1)
+#pragma pack()


     Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-10  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-09 23:43 some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620) Moore, Robert
2006-02-09 23:43 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-10  2:07 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2006-02-10  2:07   ` Thomas Renninger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-15 17:14 Moore, Robert
2006-03-15 17:14 ` Moore, Robert
2006-03-15 15:47 Moore, Robert
2006-03-15 15:47 ` Moore, Robert
2006-03-15 16:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-15 16:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-16 22:54 [PATCH] ACPI: fix vendor resource length computation Moore, Robert
2006-02-16 22:54 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-15 19:05 Luck, Tony
2006-02-15 19:05 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-16  8:59 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-16  8:59   ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-15 18:38 Moore, Robert
2006-02-15 18:38 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-15  0:04 Moore, Robert
2006-02-15  0:04 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-15 17:49 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-15 17:49   ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-14 23:25 Moore, Robert
2006-02-14 23:25 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-14 23:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14 23:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-11  0:39 some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620) Luck, Tony
2006-02-11  0:39 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-11 12:21 ` Robin Holt
2006-02-11 12:21   ` Robin Holt
2006-02-10 23:58 Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 23:58 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 23:31 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 23:31 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-13 18:51 ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-13 18:51   ` Thomas Renninger
2006-02-13 22:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-13 22:33     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-13 22:57     ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-13 22:57       ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-14  0:22       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14  0:22         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14 23:13         ` [PATCH] ACPI: fix vendor resource length computation Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14 23:13           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14 23:19           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-14 23:19             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-10 23:25 some new unaligned access while booting ia64 (HP rx2620) Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 23:25 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 23:15 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 23:15 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 23:07 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 23:07 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 22:58 Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 22:58 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-11 21:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-11 21:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-02-10 21:56 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 21:56 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 21:54 Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 21:54 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 21:19 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 21:19 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 21:15 Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 21:15 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-10 20:11 Moore, Robert
2006-02-10 20:11 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-09 21:15 Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 21:15 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 21:04 Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 21:04 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 20:55 Moore, Robert
2006-02-09 20:55 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-09 20:44 Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 20:44 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 16:56 Moore, Robert
2006-02-09 16:56 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-02 22:28 Moore, Robert
2006-02-02 22:28 ` Moore, Robert
2006-02-02 19:46 Luck, Tony
2006-02-02 19:46 ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-14 23:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-14 23:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43EBF56F.7090507@suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.