From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support HDIO_GETGEO on device-mapper volumes
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:12:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ECAD5B.9070308@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060210145348.GA12173@agk.surrey.redhat.com>
Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:35:12PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
>> Since dm doesn't implement the HDIO_GETGEO ioctl,
>>
>
> Why should it? Device-mapper constructs a virtual device and
> I think it's completely wrong for it to 'fake' a geometry.
>
> Of course dm could recognise the ioctl - but the default response
> should be the one that indicates the geometry is unknown.
>
>
That is what it did before. By failing the ioctl, that indicates that
the geometry is unknown, and that causes problems for grub.
>> grub assumes that the CHS
>> geometry is 620/128/63, which makes it impossible to configure it to
>> boot a filesystem that lives beyond the 2GB mark, even if the system
>> BIOS supports that.
>>
>
> Surely a problem in grub, not the kernel?
>
>
Yes, I think this could also be fixed on grub's end. It seems that
fdisk assumes usable default values for the geometry but grub has
different defaults that cause it problems. I think that the defaults
could be modified in grub so that it will work when HDIO_GETGEO fails.
>> The attached patch implements a simple ioctl handler that supplies a
>> compatible geometry when HDIO_GETGEO is called against a device-mapper
>> device. Its behavior is somewhat similar to what sd_mod does if the
>> scsi controller doesn't provide its own geometry.
>>
>
> What if the dm device is a linear mapping to an sd device that *does*
> provide a different geometry? Then the 'fake' geometry dm would return
> with this patch would be wrong!
>
>
There is no 'right' or 'wrong' geometry; it is all made up anyhow.
>> this seems to be a better option than having each program make
>> up its own potentially different geometry, or making an arbitrary guess.
>>
>
> I disagree - either dm should work out the *correct* geometry to
> return for those mappings where a geometry is known and it's sensible
> to return one (e.g. linear mapping to the start of certain scsi
> devices), or else it should leave it to userspace to decide how to
> handle the situation. (And there's nothing currently stopping
> userspace seeing that a dm device is constructed out of a scsi device
> and choosing to use the geometry of that underlying device.)
Except that most user space tools are not aware of dm and shouldn't need
to be.
In this case, I think the correct solution is to patch grub so that if
there is already a valid MBR on the disk, it should take the geometry
from there. If it is creating a brand new MBR, then it should use the
geometry from HDIO_GETGEO and if that fails, make up sensible defaults
like fdisk does.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-10 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-10 1:35 [PATCH] Support HDIO_GETGEO on device-mapper volumes Darrick J. Wong
2006-02-10 1:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-02-10 2:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 2:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 5:15 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 8:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-02-10 15:14 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 15:14 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 14:15 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-10 14:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-02-10 14:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2006-02-10 15:12 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2006-02-10 20:27 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-10 20:27 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-10 21:21 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 21:21 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 18:09 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-20 21:30 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 21:30 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-21 13:30 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-21 13:30 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-21 16:02 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-21 16:02 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 15:13 ` [PATCH] " Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43ECAD5B.9070308@cfl.rr.com \
--to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.