From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD828679E9 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:20:07 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43ECD9C8.3070003@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:22:00 -0700 From: John Rigby MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Asier Llano Palacios Subject: Re: Stability of MPC5200 FEC References: <1139592010.14894.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1139592010.14894.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Cc: Sylvain Munaut , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Do you have a lite5200 board that exhibits the same bad FEC behavior. If so you could try the new version on it and see if things improve. Asier Llano Palacios wrote: >We are working with MPC5200 cpu. >We've been using it since early 2.6 kernel versions. >We're currently quite stabilished with the version of the kernel Sylvain >had before the Platform Device rework. But the problem is that we are >experiencing that the FEC stops working after a long uptime. > >So, do you think that the current git version is more stable than the >one we are using? Do you think that there is anything that could stop us >upgrading to the latest version? > >The problem is that we have a custom board, with some custom devices, so >it is not so easy to upgrade. We need to know that a new version, is >more stable than the previous one, before we upgrade. As soon as we >upgrade, we can help if we find any problem. > >Thank you, >Asier Llano > > >