* sparc32-smp: rwlock wrong owner
@ 2006-02-11 19:58 Bob Breuer
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bob Breuer @ 2006-02-11 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
Running the previously posted SMP patch with 2.6.16-rc1-git4 on dual
SuperSPARC II's, it eventually died during updatedb:
BUG: rwlock wrong owner on CPU#0, pdflush/31, faeaeb48
[f0197518 : _write_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x1c ]
[f00639a8 : test_set_page_writeback+0xc8/0x12c ]
[f0083a30 : __block_write_full_page+0x104/0x418 ]
[f00a820c : mpage_writepages+0x25c/0x3e8 ]
[f006329c : do_writepages+0x40/0x74 ]
[f00a66f4 : __sync_single_inode+0x44/0x234 ]
[f00a6958 : __writeback_single_inode+0x74/0x17c ]
[f00a6c4c : sync_sb_inodes+0x1ec/0x30c ]
[f00a6e54 : writeback_inodes+0xe8/0xfc ]
[f006302c : wb_kupdate+0xc4/0x158 ]
[f0063b2c : __pdflush+0xe4/0x1c4 ]
[f0063c34 : pdflush+0x28/0x38 ]
[f004f768 : kthread+0xa8/0xc0 ]
[f001964c : kernel_thread+0x34/0x50 ]
[f004f790 : keventd_create_kthread+0x10/0x50 ]
Kernel panic - not syncing: bad locking
Any ideas on how to track this down? Could it be a buggy rwlock
function, or something else?
The only spinlock and rwlock changes I've made are at the end of the
patch in:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-sparc&m\x113822757706953&w=2
Bob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-02-11 19:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-11 19:58 sparc32-smp: rwlock wrong owner Bob Breuer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.