From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gervasio Bernal Subject: Re: New target Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:36:53 -0300 Message-ID: <43F25B85.80906@speedy.com.ar> References: <43F0B0F8.6060909@speedy.com.ar> <43F0B596.2010808@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <43F0CE59.5040201@speedy.com.ar> <43F128FB.6040009@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: <43F128FB.6040009@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Rennie deGraaf wrote: > Gervasio Bernal wrote: > >>>Rennie deGraaf wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Gervasio Bernal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>Hi all!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>I have developed a new target for iptables that encrypts a >>>>>>communication. I would like to send it so that you can see it and prove >>>>>>it. And the possibility that in a future adding it to iptables. >>>>>>Which are the steps to follow? >>>>>>Thanks a lot! >>>> >>>> >>>>Our of curiosity, what advantages does your method have over IPSec? >>>> >>>>Rennie >>> >>> >>>The great advantage is the ease of use. You only need to put 2 iptables >>>rules in each endpoint of communication. One rule for encryption and the >>>other for decryption. IPSec is a little more complicated to configure. > > > Well, I'd be interested in taking a look at your design. How about > posting your design and source somewhere so that we can take a look at it? > > Rennie Yes, of course. I have no problem. Let me fix some bugs and I post the sources.