From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gervasio Bernal Subject: Re: New target Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:37:50 -0300 Message-ID: <43F25BBE.4040903@speedy.com.ar> References: <43F0B0F8.6060909@speedy.com.ar> <43F0B596.2010808@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <43F0CE59.5040201@speedy.com.ar> <43F128FB.6040009@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <20060213185128.A78007@tempest.prismnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: <20060213185128.A78007@tempest.prismnet.com> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Allen Francom wrote: > > > Also, > > With IPSec, can you "require" any communication from > a.com to b.com to be encrypted ? > > IPTables might be able to enforce a requirement for > encrypted communications. > > Just a thought... > > FYI > -AEF > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Rennie deGraaf wrote: > > Gervasio Bernal wrote: > >>>> Rennie deGraaf wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gervasio Bernal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have developed a new target for iptables that encrypts a >>>>>>> communication. I would like to send it so that you can see it and >>>>>>> prove >>>>>>> it. And the possibility that in a future adding it to iptables. >>>>>>> Which are the steps to follow? >>>>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Our of curiosity, what advantages does your method have over IPSec? >>>>> >>>>> Rennie >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The great advantage is the ease of use. You only need to put 2 iptables >>>> rules in each endpoint of communication. One rule for encryption and the >>>> other for decryption. IPSec is a little more complicated to configure. > > > Well, I'd be interested in taking a look at your design. How about > posting your design and source somewhere so that we can take a look at > it? > > Rennie >> You are right Allen, that is another interesting difference.