From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Possibly bug in radix_tree_delete, and fix.
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:16:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F3EE8F.8060000@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17395.58244.839605.685011@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> I believe there is a bug in radix_tree_delete introduced by:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d5274261ea46f0aae93820fe36628249120d2f75
>
> The nature of the bug is that if a tag is set on a node that is being
> deleted, then that tag is unconditionally cleared in the parent of the
> node, even if the deleted node has siblings with the tag still set.
>
> I don't know what the large-scale consequences of this bug might be,
> but I'm kinda hoping fixing it will fix a nasty NFS client related
> oops we are seeing in radix_tree_tag_set ....
>
I think you're right. I was kind of suspecting I might have introduced
a silly bug somewhere after a couple of radix tree oopses popped up.
Not sure why it didn't trigger Andrew's test suite, but I guess that's
something to add.
> My suggested patch is below.
>
> Please review, confirm, and Ack:
>
It should be basically an identical block to the one below in the main
loop, yeah? You're missing the nr_cleared_tags bit.
Something like:
tags[tag] = 1;
if (tag_get(pathp->node, tag, pathp->offset)) {
tag_clear(pathp->node, tag, pathp->offset);
if (!any_tag_set(pathp->node, tag)) {
tags[tag] = 0;
nr_cleared_tags++;
}
}
And you can add an
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Thanks,
Nick
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> Fix over-zealous clearing of tags in radix_tree_delete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./lib/radix-tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff ./lib/radix-tree.c~current~ ./lib/radix-tree.c
> --- ./lib/radix-tree.c~current~ 2006-02-16 13:22:28.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./lib/radix-tree.c 2006-02-16 13:23:19.000000000 +1100
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ void *radix_tree_delete(struct radix_tre
> for (tag = 0; tag < RADIX_TREE_TAGS; tag++) {
> if (tag_get(pathp->node, tag, pathp->offset)) {
> tag_clear(pathp->node, tag, pathp->offset);
> - tags[tag] = 0;
> + tags[tag] = any_tag_set(pathp->node, tag);
> nr_cleared_tags++;
> } else
> tags[tag] = 1;
>
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-16 2:29 Possibly bug in radix_tree_delete, and fix Neil Brown
2006-02-16 3:16 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-02-16 3:48 ` Neil Brown
2006-02-16 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-16 5:08 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F3EE8F.8060000@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.