From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:14:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F4426D.9060807@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602161005450.26770@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>
>>Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>>
>>>Couldn't the id be simply equal to the jiffies when creating the conntrack
>>>entry? (And adding time_after/before when comparing ids, of course.)
>>
>>We can create more than one entry per jiffy, so that wouldn't be unique
>>anymore.
>
>
> (jiffies, tuples) would be unique even in that case.
Thats true. But what is the advantage over using the counter?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-13 2:41 [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-02-13 11:20 ` Harald Welte
2006-02-16 8:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-16 8:47 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 9:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-16 9:11 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-02-16 9:36 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 20:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-17 8:18 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 8:45 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-02-17 9:30 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 18:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-04 16:23 ` Hashtrie testing (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2) Martin Josefsson
2006-03-05 9:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-05 13:24 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-04 20:11 ` Hashtrie testing2 " Martin Josefsson
2006-03-05 11:24 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-05 17:48 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-06 13:15 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-07 18:33 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-08 6:34 ` Patrick Schaaf
2006-03-12 18:49 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-14 11:35 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-23 11:27 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-23 21:07 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-25 8:39 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-28 12:26 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-30 8:28 ` Hashtrie testing2, dancing trees Amin Azez
2006-03-31 18:43 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 8:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2 Patrick McHardy
2006-03-30 8:31 ` Amin Azez
2006-03-31 1:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-03-31 18:35 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-31 18:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-01 19:31 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-06 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-11 16:09 ` Amin Azez
2006-04-11 16:17 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <443CA579.3030908@ufomechanic.net>
2006-04-12 18:30 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F4426D.9060807@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.