From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repost - xm lists display and formatting
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:36:00 -0800
Message-ID: <43F64FD0.6070701@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF17240851.39237EDD-ON85257118.0078D462-85257118.00793306@us.ibm.com>
	<43F64CD8.3090106@us.ibm.com>
	<20060217223204.GK3848@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060217223204.GK3848@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, marvel@us.ibm.com, Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Ewan Mellor wrote:

> That's what the staging tree is for -- if there was any breakage (which
> it turns out that there wasn't) then the change would never have been
> pushed to the public unstable tree.  My email was a plea for someone to
> improve the comprehensiveness of xm-test, now that we have a new
> feature.

Yep, not sure if there is a page on the Wiki for xm-test work
to be done, tests wanted, but would be handy..

We're taking a look at cleaning up network tests, hoping to get to
enhancing hvm support, but have not yet got to anything
else..

thanks,
Nivedita