From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <43F9F7CE.4070008@namesys.com> References: <43D7C6BE.1010804@namesys.com> <43D7CA7F.4010502@namesys.com> <1138297573.6406.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43D917C7.6090004@namesys.com> <1140203578.24529.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <194f62550602200511n77ba6560t@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <194f62550602200511n77ba6560t@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Clemens Eisserer Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Clemens Eisserer wrote: >Hi again, > >Wow does that mean cryptocompress is almost ready for primetime (next >months or so)?! >I've been waiting for something like this for ages, it would be so >great if that could turn into reality soon. > >I am quite enthusiastic how it will perform on the Dual-Athlon64 + 4x >Software-Raid-5 (PATA) I plan to buy. > >Thank you many, many times!! > >lg Clemens > > > > It should work well for that hardware configuration. See our website for new benchmarks using cryptcompress.