From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43FA11E1.7070003@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:00:49 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Gyurdiev , Joshua Brindle CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , SE Linux , Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: Audit log denials for strict policy References: <43F88282.5070404@cornell.edu> <43F9F986.5050604@redhat.com> <43F9FD5E.1040302@cornell.edu> <43FA0CB2.4000507@redhat.com> <43FA101E.8020206@cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: <43FA101E.8020206@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > >> No I think this is a sorting problem in file_contexts file. >> >> Does var_log_t come after wtmp_t? >> > Yes, but that shouldn't mean anything, this file should get sorted in > matchpathcon (so I've been told..) > > The two specs are: > > /var/log/wtmp.* -- system_u:object_r:wtmp_t:s0 > /var/log/.* system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0 We seem to have a sorting problem within matchpathcon on strict policy. Strict policy labels wtmp file in a loadable module, but the sorting algorithm is using var_log_t???? Dan -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.