From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mds@mds.gotdns.com (Mark Studebaker)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:11:15 +0000
Subject: [lm-sensors] LM78
Message-Id: <43FA1453.8000909@mds.gotdns.com>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <009b01c63642$e67d9890$4100000a@thaley>
In-Reply-To: <009b01c63642$e67d9890$4100000a@thaley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

We don't have anything listed in the list below but it may give you some 
ideas. Of course check with Nat'l and with Maxim-Dallas.
Good luck.

http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/%7Elm78/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc/chips/SUMMARY

Tony Haley wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> Can anybody say if there is a pin compatible device available to use in 
> place of the National LM78 which is obsolete and not going RoHS compliant?
>  
> Apologies if this message is inappropriate.
>  
> Thanks for any leads or advice.
>  
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors