* [PATCH] don't require ebtables in the host kernel
@ 2006-02-22 8:54 Avi Kivity
2006-02-22 13:33 ` Ewan Mellor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2006-02-22 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
The network-bridge script fails when setting a few sysctls
which are only available if ebtables is present in the host
kernel. Fix by ignoring the return value of the sysctl command.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Index: xen/tools/examples/network-bridge
===================================================================
--- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)
+++ xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 992)
@@ -158,9 +158,9 @@
# Don't create the bridge if it already exists.
if ! brctl show | grep -q ${bridge} ; then
- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
brctl addbr ${bridge}
brctl stp ${bridge} off
brctl setfd ${bridge} 0
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] don't require ebtables in the host kernel
2006-02-22 8:54 [PATCH] don't require ebtables in the host kernel Avi Kivity
@ 2006-02-22 13:33 ` Ewan Mellor
2006-02-22 14:23 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ewan Mellor @ 2006-02-22 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: xen-devel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 10:54:51AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The network-bridge script fails when setting a few sysctls
> which are only available if ebtables is present in the host
> kernel. Fix by ignoring the return value of the sysctl command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
>
> Index: xen/tools/examples/network-bridge
> ===================================================================
> --- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)
> +++ xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 992)
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@
>
> # Don't create the bridge if it already exists.
> if ! brctl show | grep -q ${bridge} ; then
> - sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
> - sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
> - sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
> + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
> + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
> + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
> brctl addbr ${bridge}
> brctl stp ${bridge} off
> brctl setfd ${bridge} 0
Where did this network-bridge script come from? The stock Xen-3.0
network-bridge doesn't have these sysctl lines in the first place.
Furthermore, using ! doesn't ignore the return value -- it inverts it. I'd be
surprised if this works in systems that _do_ have ebtables.
Ewan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] don't require ebtables in the host kernel
2006-02-22 13:33 ` Ewan Mellor
@ 2006-02-22 14:23 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2006-02-22 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan Mellor; +Cc: xen-devel
Ewan Mellor wrote:
>>--- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)
>>+++ xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 992)
>>@@ -158,9 +158,9 @@
>>
>> # Don't create the bridge if it already exists.
>> if ! brctl show | grep -q ${bridge} ; then
>>- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
>>- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
>>- sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
>>+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0"
>>+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0"
>>+ ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
>> brctl addbr ${bridge}
>> brctl stp ${bridge} off
>> brctl setfd ${bridge} 0
>>
>>
>
>Where did this network-bridge script come from? The stock Xen-3.0
>network-bridge doesn't have these sysctl lines in the first place.
>
>
It comes from FC5. Sorry, should have checked the pristine Xen sources.
Sorry about the noise.
>Furthermore, using ! doesn't ignore the return value -- it inverts it. I'd be
>surprised if this works in systems that _do_ have ebtables.
>
>
No, ! on the beginning of a command tells bash to ignore the exit code:
`-e'
Exit immediately if a simple command (*note Simple
Commands::) exits with a non-zero status, unless the command
that fails is part of the command list immediately following
a `while' or `until' keyword, part of the test in an `if'
statement, part of a `&&' or `||' list, or if the command's
return status is being inverted using `!'. A trap on `ERR',
if set, is executed before the shell exits.
'sysctl -ew' would have been better though.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-22 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-22 8:54 [PATCH] don't require ebtables in the host kernel Avi Kivity
2006-02-22 13:33 ` Ewan Mellor
2006-02-22 14:23 ` Avi Kivity
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.