All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
To: Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:31:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FE29C8.1000606@bootc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere>

thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:
> From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
> Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:00:10PM +0000
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> [4295106.474000] raid6: mmxx2     2500 MB/s
>> [4295106.521000] raid6: sse1x2    2339 MB/s
>> [4295106.524000] raid6: using algorithm sse1x2 (2339 MB/s)
>> [4295106.531000] md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
>>
>> I just loaded the raid6 module for fun (might end up using it one day), and 
>> I was surprised at its choice of algorithm. By the messages above, I would 
>> have assumed it would choose the mmxx2 algorithm at 2500 MB/s instead of 
>> sse1x2 at the slightly slower 2339 MB/s. This is probably entirely expected 
>> behaviour, but why?
>>
>>     
> Because it is more cache-efficient (allows the other code to run at a
> higher speed). This comes up now and again, perhaps these messages
> should be rephrased.
>   
I knew there would be a good reason for this, I just couldn't figure it 
out from those messages. That's a very good explanation indeed, and as 
you say, perhaps the messages should be updated.

Cheers,
Chris

-- 
Chris Boot
bootc@bootc.net

      reply	other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 18:00 MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice? Chris Boot
2006-02-23 21:09 ` thunder7
2006-02-23 21:31   ` Chris Boot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43FE29C8.1000606@bootc.net \
    --to=bootc@bootc.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.