From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1P5dgrU021576 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:39:46 -0500 Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1P5cEol002636 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:38:15 GMT Message-ID: <43FFED9D.3080302@procyonlabs.com> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:39:41 -0500 From: "Randal T. Rioux" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel J Walsh CC: SE Linux Subject: Re: FYI SELinux/AppArmor press References: <43FF7418.90205@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <43FF7418.90205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/38330-1.html > Thanks for the link, and for publicizing your position. - From your blog: "Novell claims that AppArmor is easier to use for third parties." Didn't Bill Gates use the same logic? I shudder when I hear statements like that. Yes, it takes more effort and time to implement better security. Writing your password on a Post-It and slapping it on your monitor is easy too, but wouldn't a little creativity and effort to memorize your access codes be better?! Uggh. Back to lurking. - -- Randal T. Rioux | Procyon Labs IT Security R&D and Consulting Virtual: www.procyonlabs.com Physical: DC / Baltimore PGP: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xD08D1941 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD/+2ERrGMQdCNGUERA0o+AJ45D12GvaTJ8N+1qpz5p6VC9XDHcQCeLPgJ q64Q6Rk3MyUa0bEBgyQOO8w= =9wbL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.