From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Buddy wu Subject: Re: why can't use connlimit ?? Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:06:58 +0800 Message-ID: <43a0cdcb0510282106j54c6a94fx@mail.gmail.com> References: <200510281133.14216.rob0@gmx.co.uk> <20051028172106.ABA796A8D7@smtp.sterenborg.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20051028172106.ABA796A8D7@smtp.sterenborg.info> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Rob Sterenborg Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > I just think it's strange that compiling iptables would produce a .so > file when compiling the kernel does not produce an accompanying .ko file > (except maybe when ipt_connlimit is not compiled as module, but that is > something we don't know ;-)) > I want to tell you that the .so file is not produced when I combile the iptables, but it born with the installation with the linux system. And I try to complie the kernel with the latest POM, but I failed, it tell me he can't find proto member in found object when he compile the ipt_connlimit.c file. Is it want corresponding header(.h) file, but it can't find in my source files?