From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:31:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43c2227a-71c9-4cbf-bfec-5a2fbf698f27@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003111603.GU1369530@ziepe.ca>
On 10/3/24 4:16 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 01:05:08PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> It would make some sense to have something like:
>>>
>>> u64 size = arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid()
>>>
>>> /* Would require too much memory */
>>> if (size > SZ_512M)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>> Why not just check smmu->sid_bits?
>>
>> For example,
>>
>> if (smmu->sid_bits > 28)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> The check can happen before the shift.
> Sure, but IMHO it reads a bit better to check the size computed from
> the helper
>
> MAX_PAGE_ORDER is often 10, so kmalloc will always fail before we
> reach 28 bits of sid space.
I'm wondering we may just use 31 instead of using some magic number:
if (smmu->sid_bits > 31)
return -EINVAL;
If I understand correctly, the check is mainly used to avoid the u64 ->
u32 overflow. This check guarantee no overflow. If some crazy hardware
really requests that large memory, the allocation will fail.
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 17:55 [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 18:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:04 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 20:00 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 20:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-03 11:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 15:31 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2024-10-04 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:29 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:37 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:46 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:50 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:21 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-02 18:36 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43c2227a-71c9-4cbf-bfec-5a2fbf698f27@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.