All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, jgg@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from bus ops
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:05:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ca2a88-942e-4d65-87f1-30a7cf537edd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6711338e24dd1edfd02187f25cf40d8622cefdb2.1697047261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On 10/12/23 2:14 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Much as I'd like to remove iommu_present(), the final remaining users
> are proving stubbornly difficult to clean up, so kick that can down the
> road and just rework it to preserve the current behaviour without
> depending on bus ops. Since commit 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup

The iommu_present() is only used in below two drivers.

$ git grep iommu_present
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c: if 
(!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c:    if (host1x_drm_wants_iommu(dev) && 
iommu_present(&platform_bus_type)) {

Both are platform drivers and have the device pointer passed in. Just
out of curiosity, why not replacing them with device_iommu_mapped()
instead? Sorry if I overlooked previous discussion.

Best regards,
baolu

> to IOMMU device registration"), any registered IOMMU instance is already
> considered "present" for every entry in iommu_buses, so it's simply a
> case of validating the bus and checking we have at least once IOMMU.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v3: Tweak to use the ops-based check rather than group-based, to
>      properly match the existing behaviour
> v4: Just look for IOMMU instances instead of managed devices
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 5a3ce293a5de..7bb92e8b7a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -2000,9 +2000,28 @@ int bus_iommu_probe(const struct bus_type *bus)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * iommu_present() - make platform-specific assumptions about an IOMMU
> + * @bus: bus to check
> + *
> + * Do not use this function. You want device_iommu_mapped() instead.
> + *
> + * Return: true if some IOMMU is present and aware of devices on the given bus;
> + * in general it may not be the only IOMMU, and it may not have anything to do
> + * with whatever device you are ultimately interested in.
> + */
>   bool iommu_present(const struct bus_type *bus)
>   {
> -	return bus->iommu_ops != NULL;
> +	bool ret = false;
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iommu_buses); i++) {
> +		if (iommu_buses[i] == bus) {
> +			spin_lock(&iommu_device_lock);
> +			ret = !list_empty(&iommu_device_list);
> +			spin_unlock(&iommu_device_lock);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_present);
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11 18:14 [PATCH v5 0/7] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] iommu: Factor out some helpers Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 23:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 23:04   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-12  6:05   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-10-12 11:40     ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:37       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 12:57         ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-12 12:58   ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-18 23:05   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] iommu: Validate that devices match domains Robin Murphy
2023-10-18 23:14   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-24 18:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 12:39     ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-25 12:55       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 16:05         ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-25 16:15           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_domain_alloc() from bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 23:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 23:15   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Don't register fwnode for legacy binding Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:56   ` Will Deacon
2023-10-18 23:29   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-18 23:36   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] iommu: Clean up open-coded ownership checks Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:57   ` Will Deacon
2023-10-18 23:40   ` Jerry Snitselaar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43ca2a88-942e-4d65-87f1-30a7cf537edd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.