All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New reliability technique
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:30:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44019F6C.4020400@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020602260425p70fc4c5cn6de8dd6aa8a876d7@mail.gmail.com>

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com> wrote:
> 
>>Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
>>e.g. software suspend)?
>>
>>We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
>>kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.
> 
> 
> What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
> memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.
> 

And for !slab, we unmap kernel virtual addresses with page debugging,
which seems like a better solution.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

      reply	other threads:[~2006-02-26 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-25 13:21 New reliability technique Victor Porton
2006-02-25 13:26 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 13:27   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 19:52     ` Avi Kivity
2006-02-25 19:56       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 22:44         ` Janos Farkas
2006-02-26 11:34       ` Victor Porton
2006-02-26 12:25         ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-26 12:30           ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44019F6C.4020400@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=avi@argo.co.il \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=porton@ex-code.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.