From: Rimas Kudelis <rq@akl.lt>
To: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Paulo Matias <syscoder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for Acer TravelMate and similar laptops
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:39:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44023C36.2040404@akl.lt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602262315.k1QNFtak008145@auster.physics.adelaide.edu.au>
Hello Jonathan,
>> Also, please note the "(?)"'s next to CD and Beep controls. These
>> controls don't actually influence anything now, but I suspect they
>> would work after a few more GPIO commands are issued, so I've left
>> them there for now (read below).
>
> Stylistically I think the "?" can be omitted, but others might have different
> opinions.
I left those as a reminder that these widgets are untested/not working
yet. If after fiddling with GPIO commands we don't make them work,
they're useless and IMHO should be removed. If we do make them work,
they should be renamed.
>> Btw, this patch also fixes a few comment typos in patch_realtek.c and
>> changes one setting in test model (it seems like inicially copy-pasted
>> from Fujitsu model). Also, it adds lines muting NID 0x15 for Fujitsu
>> model on startup (Jonathan, you said it turned out not to be
>> problematic at all).
>
> Please, I would very much like to test this Fujitsu change before it goes
> in. It *appeared* that perhaps with the most recent CVS the omission of
> NID 0x15 was not necessary but I have not verified this in the context
> of the model-specific initialisation verbs yet.
Sure. I was hoping you would test my changes before Takashi commits
them. :) I should've stated it clearly though...
>> Jonathan, how about your idea to add GPIO controls to the test model?
>
> Hopefully coming early this week.
>
>> Now a few notes/questions:
>> * is there any reason in defining ADC NIDs for every model separately?
>> They seem to be the same anyways, and not to get in anyones way. Or do
>> they?
>
> Up to this point the reason for the differing definitions has been
> due to the different ways things needed to use the ADC NIDs. As part of
> a consolidation patch I'm preparing for Takashi I hope to clean this
> stuff up a bit.
Very good. I'm eagerly waiting for that. I hope, ALSA 1.0.11 won't
come out until we're done with ALC260.
>> * If the jack is called "Line In", should I leave it as "Line" in
>> mixer, or should I name it "Line In"?
>
> What do you think is less confusing?
I don't actually know. It doesn't make significant difference for me,
so it's hard to tell. I'm just asking about the policy - is "Line" a
conventional name in ALSA, or is it a convention to name controls like
jacks?..
>> * What's your opinion about adding a model configuration line that
>> would only check the subvendor (and ignore the subdevice setting)?
>> There would be more chances to autodetect an Acer laptop then, but
>> OTOH, if one day there'll be an ALC-260 based Acer with a different
>> config, you'd risk to misdetect, or to regress in automatic Acer
>> detectlion by removing that line...
>
> I believe the generally accepted way is to include both. If the machine
> config did change in future there's really no guarantee that the existing
> models will just magically work. It's better to effectively force the new
> models to be explicitly tested, and only when they're verified do they get
> added to the "known model" list.
That's what I thought... However, it may as always result in people
simply using a "model=acer" parameter and not bothering to inform the
developers about the success. But I think you're right.
> In the next day or so I'll be sending a list of pending patches to Takashi
> (as requested) so everything can be synced correctly and nothing gets
> missed. Some of these will result in minor changes to the Acer config. Do
> you mind if we hold your patch over until then, and I'll submit it with the
> rest? It will make Takashi's (and my) life easier if we do it this way.
Of course I don't mind. You may consider my patch being a sketch which
you can transform into whatever seems best for you. Of course, I'll
want to test the results too. :)
Regards,
Rimas
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-26 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-26 22:35 [PATCH] Add support for Acer TravelMate and similar laptops Rimas Kudelis
2006-02-26 23:15 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-02-26 23:39 ` Rimas Kudelis [this message]
2006-02-28 1:25 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-02-28 13:55 ` Rimas Kudelis
2006-02-28 14:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-02-28 14:32 ` Rimas Kudelis
2006-02-28 22:33 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-02-28 19:06 ` Rimas Kudelis
2006-02-28 20:32 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-28 23:22 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-02-28 23:35 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-28 23:45 ` Re: [PATCH] Add support for Acer TravelMate and Jonathan Woithe
2006-02-28 23:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-28 23:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-01 0:22 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-03-01 0:29 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-01 1:52 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-03-01 7:32 ` Rimas Kudelis
2006-03-01 22:49 ` Jonathan Woithe
2006-03-01 22:51 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-04 21:37 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-27 12:58 ` [PATCH] Add support for Acer TravelMate and similar laptops Takashi Iwai
2006-02-27 13:43 ` Rimas Kudelis
2006-02-27 13:53 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-02-28 1:28 ` [PATCH] Add support for Acer TravelMate and similar Jonathan Woithe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44023C36.2040404@akl.lt \
--to=rq@akl.lt \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au \
--cc=syscoder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.