From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@soft.fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) - Update Documentation/pci.txt
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:52:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440285AB.20903@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44028502.4000108@soft.fujitsu.com>
This patch adds the description about legacy I/O port free driver into
Documentation/pci.txt.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Documentation/pci.txt | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.16-rc4/Documentation/pci.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc4.orig/Documentation/pci.txt 2006-02-27 13:29:34.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc4/Documentation/pci.txt 2006-02-27 13:29:42.000000000 +0900
@@ -269,3 +269,31 @@
pci_find_device() Superseded by pci_get_device()
pci_find_subsys() Superseded by pci_get_subsys()
pci_find_slot() Superseded by pci_get_slot()
+
+
+9. Legacy I/O port free driver
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+On the large servers, I/O port resources could not be assigned to all
+PCI devices because it is limited (64KB on Intel Architecture[1]) and
+it would be fragmented (I/O base register of PCI-to-PCI bridge will
+usually be aligned to a 4KB boundary[2]). On such systems,
+pci_enable_device() and pci_request_regions() for those devices will
+fail because those functions try to enable all the regions. However,
+it is a problem for some PCI devices which provide both I/O port and
+MMIO interface because some of them can be handled without using I/O
+port interface. The reason why such devices provide I/O port interface
+is for compatibility to legacy OSs. So this kind of devices should
+work even if enough I/O port resources are not assigned. The "PCI
+Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0" also mentions about this topic
+(Please see p.44, "IMPLEMENTATION NOTE").
+
+This problem is solved by telling the kernel if your driver needs to
+use I/O port to handle the device. If your driver doesn't need any I/O
+port regions to handle the device, you can tell it to the kernel by
+setting the no_ioport flag in struct pci_dev. If the no_ioport flag is
+set, kernel will never touch I/O port regions for the corresponding
+devices. Please note that you need to set the no_ioport flag before
+calling pci_enable_device() and pci_request_regions().
+
+[1] Some systems support 64KB I/O port space per PCI segment.
+[2] Some PCI-to-PCI bridges support optional 1KB aligned I/O base.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-27 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-27 4:50 [PATCH 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) - Add no_ioport flag into pci_dev Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
2006-02-27 6:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) - Update Documentation/pci.txt Grant Grundler
2006-02-27 8:27 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 12:18 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 12:27 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 4:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) - Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 4:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) - Make Emulex lpfc " Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-27 17:43 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 3) Jeff Garzik
2006-02-27 21:42 ` Grant Grundler
2006-02-27 22:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-27 22:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-27 22:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-27 22:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-27 23:28 ` Grant Grundler
2006-02-28 2:59 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440285AB.20903@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@soft.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.