From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:59:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Htb queueing problem Message-Id: <44071667.3050804@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <44043A85.6080302@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44043A85.6080302@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Diego Andr=E9s Asenjo Gonzalez wrote: > Hi again! >=20 >>> $IPT -A FORWARD -t mangle -p udp -s 172.16.0.185/32 -i eth1 --sport=20 >>> 10000:10100 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 0x44 >> >> >> >> This should be -o eth1 or you should be shaping it on eth0 or if it's=20 >> for the shaping box you need to do some sort of ingress shaping/policing. >=20 >=20 > Sorry, a typo :p. You pointed clearly the "-o eth1" in the previous=20 > message. Really, is the first time that I use -i or -o in the rule. One=20 > point is that the box is a bridge between a LAN and a router, eth0 is in = > the LAN and eth1 in the router. So, I thought I can ommit the interface. >=20 > Anyway, I think that this is an strange situation: there are marked=20 > (maybe not "well" marked) packages, but there is no traffic. I am trying = > with the -o option. > It could be the bridging - I've never tried maybe you could look into=20 ebtables or just use tc/u32 to do the matching. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc