From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Reiser4 default in Underground Dekstop distribution Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:33:10 -0800 Message-ID: <44072C56.1020504@namesys.com> References: <200602251203.09958.Peter.Foldiak@st-andrews.ac.uk> <200603012325.54461.marcel@hilzinger.hu> <44062587.9020005@namesys.com> <200603020019.54410.marcel@hilzinger.hu> <5d8b7b90603011636w3b557369r64617ad6386437ed@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <5d8b7b90603011636w3b557369r64617ad6386437ed@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Islam Amer Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, "E. Gryaznova" Islam Amer wrote: >Hi my livecd phaeronix http://www.phaeronix.net supports reiser4 and >resier3 and are the default choices. > >It has a patched 2.6.11 kernel, back in the days when IO/CPU >performance was really good. > >It's out of date and I am preparing a new one, also with reiser4 >support. But IO performance nowadays is not so good. > Are you referring specifically to reiser4 IO performance? Can you give me reproduceable specifics so that we can fix it? Thanks, Hans > I am using >2.6.15-archck4. > >Maybe things will be better in 2.6.16 .. I also had problems with grub >starting with 2.6.15 , so I switched to lilo. But I had problems with >that too, ( which I described on this mailing list a few days ago ). >So now I am using a 50Mb ext2 boot partition. > >I hope reiser4 "rises" back to expectations again. Thank you :P > > > >