All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* states and UDP
@ 2006-03-03 14:34 T. Horsnell
  2006-03-03 14:44 ` Steven M Campbell
  2006-03-06  1:43 ` Philip Craig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: T. Horsnell @ 2006-03-03 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Am I right in thinking that the stateful capabilities
of iptables (NEW/ESTABLISHED/RELATED etc) only apply to
tcp connections? If not, how are these states defined for
udp?

iptables doesnt complain if I add a rule containing
'-p udp -m state --state NEW'

Thanks,
Terry.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: states and UDP
  2006-03-03 14:34 states and UDP T. Horsnell
@ 2006-03-03 14:44 ` Steven M Campbell
  2006-03-06  1:43 ` Philip Craig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven M Campbell @ 2006-03-03 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

T. Horsnell wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that the stateful capabilities
> of iptables (NEW/ESTABLISHED/RELATED etc) only apply to
> tcp connections? If not, how are these states defined for
> udp?
>
> iptables doesnt complain if I add a rule containing
> '-p udp -m state --state NEW'
>
> Thanks,
> Terry.
>
>   
any tracked connection can have state.   For instance, one could write a 
conneciton tracker for NFS over UDP mounts and use the state flag in 
firewall rules.  That's not a real example (to my knowledge), I'm just 
showing that the capability is there.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: states and UDP
  2006-03-03 14:34 states and UDP T. Horsnell
  2006-03-03 14:44 ` Steven M Campbell
@ 2006-03-06  1:43 ` Philip Craig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philip Craig @ 2006-03-06  1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: T. Horsnell; +Cc: netfilter

On 03/04/2006 12:34 AM, T. Horsnell wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that the stateful capabilities
> of iptables (NEW/ESTABLISHED/RELATED etc) only apply to
> tcp connections? If not, how are these states defined for
> udp?
> 
> iptables doesnt complain if I add a rule containing
> '-p udp -m state --state NEW'

Conntrack states are valid for all protocols.
They are different from TCP states.
The man page and tutorial describe what they mean:
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#USERLANDSTATES



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-06  1:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-03 14:34 states and UDP T. Horsnell
2006-03-03 14:44 ` Steven M Campbell
2006-03-06  1:43 ` Philip Craig

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.