From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Giovanni A. Orlando" Subject: Re: Coding Standards Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:11:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4408B116.9090801@futuretg.com> References: <440775A7.9070009@ciise.concordia.ca> <44087B43.4000900@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <44087B43.4000900@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9_Laverdi=E8re?= , reiserfs-list@namesys.com >>Hello, >> >>I was reading an article long ago where Mr Reiser was saying that he >>was using military grade coding standards. And that it is also the >>reason why Reiser4 is not integrated by default in the Linux kernel. >> >> > >I think that was a minor issue. The major issues are political. > > > So ... what the hell happens? Why is not included yet? Thanks, Giovanni. >>My experience at looking at GNU code is that it is sloppy and I want >>to start a high-assurance project with the best of the best of coding >>practices... something making me feel that the GNU coding guidelines >>are not the best of options. >> >> > >I would really look into the various security and secure coding papers >and articles that have been funded by DARPA and others over the years. >Pick through them, read them, and code that way. The guys writing the >articles are much more expert than I am on it. > > > >>Your input would be very appreciated! >> >> >> > > > -- -- -- http://www.FutureTG.com - The Main Website. http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com - The Website for Linux Training. http://www.RPMParadaise.com - The Website for RPM Packages. Phone: +58 412 55 41 338 (I am in Caracas, actually) FT Addresses are located at: http://www.futuretg.com/FT/contact.html