From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:46:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4408D55F.4090105@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060303234330.GA14401@ti64.telemetry-investments.com>
Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:09:57PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Or sata_nv/libata is to blame.
>
>
> In case you are coming late to the thread:
I'm not. Thus my comments refuting Lee's silly speculation.
> Andi suggested:
>
> Yes, I bet something forgets to turn on interrupts again and it's
> picked up by (and blamed on) the next guy who does an unconditional
> sti, which happens to be __do_sofitrq or idle.
>
> That sounds right to me.
Unlikely. More likely is a disabled interrupt period is longer than a
tick period, or similar.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-03 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-27 21:22 AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer bubshait
2006-02-27 22:21 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-02-27 22:47 ` Jason Baron
2006-02-28 7:41 ` Abdulla Bubshait
2006-02-28 22:00 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-02-28 23:53 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 14:46 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-01 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 15:43 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-01 15:47 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 18:07 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-01 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 19:16 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-03 19:18 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-03 21:26 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-03 22:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-03 23:43 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-03 23:46 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-03-03 23:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-04 0:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-04 0:07 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <20060315213638.GA17817@ti64.telemetry-investments.com>
2006-03-15 21:45 ` libata/sata_nv latency on NVIDIA CK804 [was Re: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer] Lee Revell
2006-03-15 21:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-16 15:13 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-16 16:57 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-22 16:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-22 18:39 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-22 23:07 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-15 22:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:36 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-15 22:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 23:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-15 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 22:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 23:14 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-15 23:44 ` Lee Revell
[not found] ` <20060316002133.GE17817@ti64.telemetry-investments.com>
2006-03-16 0:48 ` Long latencies with MD RAID 1 [was Re: libata/sata_nv latency on NVIDIA CK804 ] Lee Revell
2006-03-16 3:15 ` libata/sata_nv latency on NVIDIA CK804 [was Re: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer] Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-16 4:20 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-16 14:42 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-03-16 0:01 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 22:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-15 22:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:04 ` [patch] latency-tracing-v2.6.16.patch Ingo Molnar
2006-03-15 22:32 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-16 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-04 12:06 ` AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer Martin Schlemmer
2006-03-05 7:07 ` Alexander Samad
2006-03-02 15:47 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-02-28 21:17 ` Abdulla Bubshait
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-06 17:37 [RFC] Encrypting file system Michael Halcrow
2006-03-06 21:36 ` AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer Timo Schroeter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4408D55F.4090105@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.