From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ipv6 conntrack status? Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:03:56 +0100 Message-ID: <440957FC.6050506@trash.net> References: <20060225111316.GA13280@mx.ytti.net> <200603021741.k22Hf8Hr013260@toshiba.co.jp> <20060302175854.GA741@mx.ytti.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Yasuyuki KOZAKAI Return-path: To: Saku Ytti In-Reply-To: <20060302175854.GA741@mx.ytti.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2006-03-03 02:41 +0900), Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > > >>You can use nf_conntrack_ipv6 in mainline kernel, not ip6_conntrack. >>To build it, please disable IP_NF_CONNTRACK, enable NF_CONNTRACK and >>NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6. NF_CONNTRACK is in the menu "Core Netfilter Configuration", >>and NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6 in the menu "IPv6: Netfilter Configuration >>(EXPERIMENTAL)". > > > Indeed menuconfig hides the new conntrack if old one is chosen, > as was my case. Maybe we can find a better way to choose between the two conntrack implementations. Right now its really confusing, IP_NF_CONNTRACK hides NF_CONNTRACK, but if NF_CONNTRACK is selected I can still choose IP_NF_CONNTRACK even though it won't work. Maybe a "choice" option?