From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4409FA66.7010802@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141498341.5185.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
jamal wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
>>>
>>
>>Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions
>>within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still
>>needs more testing.
>
>
> Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post
> what you are doing.
I'll fix it.
> What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental?
> I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like
> "Patrick found a bug"[1].
I think a sane metric is "opinion of people who know the code". But
I don't care much, I don't think many people care whether something
is maked experimental or not.
> [1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be
> experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
I'll take that as a compliment :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-04 16:07 [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2006-03-04 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-03-04 18:52 ` jamal
2006-03-04 20:36 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-03-10 11:04 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-12 17:56 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4409FA66.7010802@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.