From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Dual ISP routing and NAT problem
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:23:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440C700F.1040000@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44071C23.7040206@chello.at>
Hello,
nobody even commented this post?
What's wrong about it?
Thank you
Mart
Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello newsgroup,
>
> I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with
> the problem I have.
>
> The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing,
> multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one
> private ip range.
> I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working.
> The default route is via 'PROV_STATIC', only packets comming from LAN
> 192.168.111.0/24 are routed via 'PROV_DSL'.
> Now if I want to do network address translation via iptables for certain
> traffic coming into the dsl interface ppp0,
> packets never reach their destination.
> DNAT into DMZ or any of the LANs over the eth0 interface works as expected.
> So for example applying a DNAT rule like:
> 'iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ppp0 -d 217.92.8.242 -p tcp --dport 80
> -j DNAT --to-destination 62.155.170.254'
> fails.
>
> Same for NAT attempts into the LANs 192.168.112.0/24 and 192.168.113.0/24.
> While DNAT into LAN 192.168.111.0/24 works perfectly.
>
> So I think the problem is that traffic from the DMZ and those two LANs
> have the ip rules applied to end up in the the table 'PROV_STATIC'.
> Which usually is what I want, but not in this case, where I want port or
> protocol specific traffic to be routed differntly.
> Is there a way to 'override' the default routing behaviour for i.e. http
> traffic?
> I tried the iptables ROUTE target, but did not get it working, but could
> of course be my error.
> Is there anything wrong with my current routing tables?
>
> Thank you for any help you can give.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mart
>
> <------------------------------------------------->
> Setup:
>
> Firewall / Router:
> 2 external interfaces
> 3 lan interfaces
> 1 dmz interface
>
> External interfaces:
> 1 - PROV_STATIC:
> IP: 62.155.170.250
> Network: 62.155.170.248/30
> Interface: static interface eth0
> global default route via: 62.155.170.249
> 2 - PROV_DSL:
> IP: 217.92.8.242
> Peer: 217.6.98.186
> Interface: DSL interface ppp0 (pppoe over eth1)
>
> DMZ interface:
> IP_1: 62.155.170.253
> Network_1: 62.155.170.252/30
> IP_2: 192.168.0.1
> Network_2: 192.168.0.0/24
> Interface: eth4
>
> LAN interfaces:
> 1: IP: 192.168.111.1
> Network: 192.168.111.0/24
> Interface: eth5
> 2: IP: 192.168.112.1
> Network: 192.168.112.0/24
> Interface: eth2
> 3: IP: 192.168.113.1
> Network: 192.168.113.0/24
> Interface: eth3
>
> igor:/# ip route list table PROV_DSL
> 217.6.98.186 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 217.92.8.242
> 62.155.170.248/30 dev eth0 scope link src 62.155.170.250
> 62.155.170.252/30 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 62.155.170.253
> 192.168.112.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.112.1
> 192.168.113.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.113.1
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
> 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth5 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.1
> 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.111.3 dev eth5 proto kernel src 192.168.111.1
> 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
> default via 217.6.98.186 dev ppp0
>
>
> igor:/# ip route list table PROV_STATIC
> 217.6.98.186 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 217.92.8.242
> 62.155.170.248/30 dev eth0 scope link src 62.155.170.250
> 62.155.170.252/30 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 62.155.170.253
> 192.168.112.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.112.1
> 192.168.113.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.113.1
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
> 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth5 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.1
> 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.111.3 dev eth5 proto kernel src 192.168.111.1
> 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
> default via 62.155.170.249 dev eth0
>
>
> igor:/# ip route list
> 217.6.98.186 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 217.92.8.242
> 62.155.170.248/30 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 62.155.170.250
> 62.155.170.252/30 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 62.155.170.253
> 192.168.112.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.112.1
> 192.168.113.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.113.1
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth4 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
> 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth5 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.1
> 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.111.3 dev eth5 proto kernel
> default via 62.155.170.249 dev eth0
>
>
> igor:/# ip rule list
> 0: from all lookup local
> 32759: from 192.168.0.0/24 lookup PROV_STATIC
> 32760: from 62.155.170.252/30 lookup PROV_STATIC
> 32761: from 192.168.113.0/24 lookup PROV_STATIC
> 32762: from 192.168.112.0/24 lookup PROV_STATIC
> 32763: from 192.168.111.0/24 lookup PROV_DSL
> 32764: from 217.92.8.242 lookup PROV_DSL
> 32765: from 62.155.170.250 lookup PROV_STATIC
> 32766: from all lookup main
> 32767: from all lookup default
> <------------------------------------------------->
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 16:24 [LARTC] Dual ISP routing and NAT problem Mart Frauenlob
2006-03-06 17:23 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
2006-03-07 13:14 ` Nathan Rodrigues Levy
2006-03-07 15:15 ` Aleksander
2006-03-09 12:00 ` Markus Schulz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440C700F.1040000@chello.at \
--to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.