From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [patch] ipt_recent Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: <440ECB1B.4070507@trash.net> References: <43F9EA77.4060208@ufomechanic.net> <44096532.2070000@trash.net> <440DAB6B.4020208@ufomechanic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Amin Azez In-Reply-To: <440DAB6B.4020208@ufomechanic.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Amin Azez wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>> @@ -20,6 +25,8 @@ >>> u_int32_t hit_count; >>> u_int8_t check_set; >>> u_int8_t invert; >>> + u_int8_t check_count; >>> + u_int32_t entry_count; >>> char name[IPT_RECENT_NAME_LEN]; >>> u_int8_t side; >>> }; >> >> >> >> Sorry, we can't do that since it breaks userspace compatibility. But I'm >> really glad someone finally has the stomach to touch ipt_recent, I'll >> review your other patches now. > > > I've reworked that functionality significantly in a new patch to send > next week. I will see if I can find a way to make use of existing > structures to add the functionality. Otherwise you can you versioning as in ipt_MARK and a couple of other targets. > > I heard tell that ipt_recent needed a maintainer? Yes, we need someone familiar with the code to review patches, fix bugs and clean it up.