From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <lbocseg@domain.hid>
To: Christopher Stone <chris@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai vs. RTLinux
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:48:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44104044.20606@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006f01c64312$a28ab730$a10a10ac@domain.hid>
Christopher Stone escreveu:
> ...
> Vendor specific API's are like drugs, once you get hooked on them, it is
> difficult to incur the cost of kicking the habit. With Xenomai you can use
> any of a number of skins, but, would be wise to consider the POSIX skin. By
> using the industry standard POSIX API your code remains portable and more
> future proof.
>
Actually it depends. At the moment, as far as I know, RTDM drivers are
not able to communicate to POSIX written programs in every way, like it
does with programs written using the native API. So, if there is any
plan to write real-time driver (and RTDM really makes this process much
easier), so I would recommend using the native API instead. Unless
Xenomai is going to support better intercommunication between different
skins, if it is possible, or if someone will take the effort to maintain
a POSIX version of RTDM...
Rodrigo.
_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 22:48 [Xenomai-help] Xenomai vs. RTLinux Jeff Webb
2006-03-09 0:44 ` Christopher Stone
2006-03-09 0:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-03-09 14:48 ` Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas [this message]
2006-03-09 15:03 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-03-09 16:31 ` Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
2006-03-09 18:02 ` Jeff Webb
2006-03-09 18:19 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-03-30 16:22 ` [Xenomai-core] AMD x86_64 support Jeff Webb
2006-03-09 0:47 ` [Xenomai-help] Xenomai vs. RTLinux Jan Kiszka
2006-03-09 8:08 ` Heikki Lindholm
2006-03-10 14:36 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-03-10 17:07 ` Jeff Webb
2006-03-10 20:33 ` Dmitry Adamushko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44104044.20606@domain.hid \
--to=lbocseg@domain.hid \
--cc=chris@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.