All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:04:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44105227.8020503@mbligh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060309155437.GE5410@kvack.org>

Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:50:15AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
>>Do we NOT want to have DEBUG_SLAB and DEBUG_PAGEALLOC both enabled?
>>Running multiple permutations is going to get really painful on the
>>systems involved. Any other requests for what gets enabled (I really
>>want to just stick to one 'debug' setup if possible).
> 
> 
> Debug kernels are incredibly slow, making hitting certain races next to 
> impossible.  By all means non-DEBUG kernels should definately be getting 
> tested.

It'd still run a totally non-debug kernel as well - I want that for the
perf tests etc anyway. I guess the question is whether the debug kernels
should have most of the DEBUG_* turned on, or just a select few.

M.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-09 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-06  0:17 Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 18:43   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 19:51       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:58         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:06       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 20:24         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:30           ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-06 20:33             ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-06 21:14               ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:41             ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:55               ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 21:57                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-09 15:50                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-09 16:04                     ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2006-03-09 16:08                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 16:41                     ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 20:36         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:53           ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:56             ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 21:16                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:54                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:05                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 22:08                     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:27                       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:52                       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:54                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 23:01                         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 23:06                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 23:24                             ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07  0:17                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07  0:25                                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07  3:15                               ` Mike Christie
2006-03-07  3:20                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 18:01                                   ` James Bottomley
2006-03-07 19:40                                     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07  8:47                       ` [PATCH] slab: fix offslab_limit in calculate_slab_order (Was: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2) Pekka J Enberg
2006-03-07 17:12                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 19:21                           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-03-07 19:28                       ` Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2006-03-06 22:44                     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:48   ` Mike Christie
2006-03-06 18:49     ` Mike Christie
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-08  6:25 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08  8:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08  8:46   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08  9:02     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08  9:12       ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08  9:23         ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 14:35           ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44105227.8020503@mbligh.org \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.