From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:13:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4411EBF3.2010007@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4411C42F.9080908@oracle.com>
Zach Brown wrote:
>>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
>
> I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
> load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect
> vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
> pressure on the TLB.
Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?
Regards,
Daniel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:13:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4411EBF3.2010007@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4411C42F.9080908@oracle.com>
Zach Brown wrote:
>>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
>
> I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
> load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect
> vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
> pressure on the TLB.
Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-10 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-03 22:27 [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom Daniel Phillips
2006-03-03 22:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-04 0:53 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Mark Fasheh
2006-03-04 0:53 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-04 3:42 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2006-03-04 3:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-04 7:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-04 7:37 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2006-03-05 19:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-05 19:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 1:28 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 1:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 2:58 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 2:58 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 4:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 4:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 19:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 19:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-07 3:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 3:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 4:58 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Mark Fasheh
2006-03-07 4:58 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-07 6:56 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2006-03-07 6:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-09 6:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-09 6:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-09 7:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 7:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 4:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-09 4:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-09 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-10 5:14 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-10 5:14 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-10 0:21 ` [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance Mark Fasheh
2006-03-10 0:21 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-10 1:14 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-03-10 7:10 ` Joel Becker
2006-03-10 7:10 ` Joel Becker
2006-03-11 1:09 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-11 1:09 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-11 1:57 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-03-11 1:57 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-03-10 11:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 11:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 18:23 ` Zach Brown
2006-03-10 18:23 ` Zach Brown
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 2:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom J. Bruce Fields
2006-03-10 2:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-03-10 10:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 10:27 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4411EBF3.2010007@google.com \
--to=phillips@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.