From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FI01E-0001Xg-9L for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:04:12 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FI01D-0001XT-AN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:04:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FI01C-0001XH-D9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:04:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FI01C-0001XE-BH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:04:10 -0500 Received: from [157.24.2.30] (helo=smtp1.cc.lut.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FI04g-0000tM-13 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:07:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.cc.lut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27279701DF for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:04:07 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp1.cc.lut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.cc.lut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32379-03 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:04:06 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (lk4-a-4-1.lnet.lut.fi [157.24.102.107]) by smtp1.cc.lut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F09701BA for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:04:06 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <44129290.3000204@nic.fi> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:04:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <44100C67.6000402@itwm.fraunhofer.de> <878xriwfyv.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20060310154510.GA11141@soul.cs.tau.ac.il> <87slpqt169.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <87slpqt169.fsf@xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by lut.fi Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Status of UNDI Support X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:04:11 -0000 Marco Gerards wrote: > I prefer to support both. The etherboot drivers usually work better > than UNDI, AFAIK. But when etherboot does not support a card, people > can fall back to UNDI. Don't forget that not all cards support UNDI, > so I don't want UNDI only. I think the many driver manufactures has NDIS drivers. So I think supporting this option would be nice. Perhaps when the network driver interface has been specified (and I have all critical parts in video support done), I could check it out. Here is the URL for it: http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/ Thanks, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen