From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Prindeville Subject: Re: Ludicrous amount of spam on this list Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:30:15 -0700 Message-ID: <4415E467.3040705@redfish-solutions.com> References: <1142276619.9235.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1142278013.13256.10.camel@mindpipe> <1142279401.13256.18.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.redfish-solutions.com (mail.redfish-solutions.com [71.36.29.88]) by alsa.jcu.cz (ALSA's E-mail Delivery System) with ESMTP id 17C7B1CF for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:30:19 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <1142279401.13256.18.camel@mindpipe> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Lee Revell Cc: Takashi Iwai , Adrian McMenamin , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:42 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>Well, but it's true that the amount of spam from alsa-devel is much >>more than from LKML. (It's still acceptable to me, though.) > > > I think the spam mails are close in number but the much greater LKML > volume drowns it out. It does seem that we should be able to do a > little better, like loweing the spam score threshold, which IIRC can be > done via the Mailman interface. > > How about simply filtering out all HTML mail like LKML does? > > Lee If I can vote for that more than once, I will... ;-) -Philip ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642