Re: xm-test failures?

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>]

Paul Larson wrote:
> The numbers I was seeing before were someone untrusted, so I ran it again in a 
> more controlled environment.  Changeset is 9238:c445d4a0dd76
>   
Have you ran it a few times?  I was seeing vary number of failures each 
time I ran it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
> Xm-test execution summary:
>   PASS:  109
>   FAIL:  7
>   XPASS: 0
>   XFAIL: 3
>
>
> Details:
>
>  FAIL: 09_block_attach_and_dettach_device_check_data_pos 
> 	 Failed to attach block device /proc/partitions does not show that!
>
>  FAIL: 02_block-list_attachbd_pos 
> 	 Failed to verify that block dev is attached on DomainU
>
>  FAIL: 03_block-list_anotherbd_pos 
> 	 Failed to verify that block dev is attached on DomainU
>
> XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos 
> 	 ping loopback failed for size 65507. ping eth0 failed for size 65507.
>
> XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos 
> 	 Ping to dom0 failed for size 65507.
>
> XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos 
> 	 Ping failed for size 65507.
>
>  FAIL: 02_vtpm-cat_pcrs 
> 	 virtual TPM manager must be started to run this test
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>