All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravenborg.org,
	kai@germaschewski.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not rebuild full kernel tree again and again...
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:31:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4419AEEA.50702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060313163041.GA29719@mars.ravnborg.org>

Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:47:08PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>  >>I'm seeing this behaviour too in -rc6 and it is a bad regression
> 
>>>>for a developer. I assume there will be some workaround?
>>>
>>>I assume debian soon will update make to current version from CVS that
>>>has this behaviour removed.
>>>
>>
>>So long as it just requires a tools update then that's fine for me.
> 
> I should note here that it was agreed with Paul that upcoming make
> relase will not have this change, but next release will have it.
> So 2.6.17 kbuild will take care of being forward compatible in this
> matter.
> 

Wouldn't it be better to have an option to tell make to assume the old 
behavior? I only skimmed the original thread but it didn't seem terribly 
complex thing to do. A LOT of people will be doing things on pre-2.6.17 
kernel for quite some time and they will be cursing a lot if they have 
to rebuild everything everytime.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-12 17:25 [PATCH] Do not rebuild full kernel tree again and again Petr Vandrovec
2006-03-12 17:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13  6:10   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-13  9:12     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13 10:47       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-13 16:30         ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-16 18:31           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-03-16 18:37             ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-16 19:06               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4419AEEA.50702@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=petr@vandrovec.name \
    --cc=sam@ravenborg.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.