From: Aurelien Degremont <aurelien.degremont@cea.fr>
To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jacques-Charles Lafoucriere <jc.lafoucriere@cea.fr>
Subject: Re: NFS superblock sharing implies mount flags bug
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:20:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <441EAC05.7020903@cea.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603151038.LAA21392@styx.bruyeres.cea.fr>
Nobody is interested by this issue ?
It could be easily reproduced. All recent versions are concerned.
Aurelien
Aurelien Degremont wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm facing incorrect using of mount flags when dealing with NFS mounts
> and I think it could be seen as a bug.
>
> The error occurs when mounting the same NFS export many times, on the
> same machine but *with different mount flags*, particularly concerning
> RO/RW flags.
>
> As the NFS client code re-uses superblocks when it detects that it is
> the same export (same server/same port/same exported directory) and that
> the read-only flag is managed as a per-superblock flag, if a NFS exports
> is mounted a second time, the superblock of the first mount is re-used
> and the specified mount flag is ignored.
>
> # mount foo:/bar /bar_ro -o ro
> # mount foo:/bar /bar_rw -o rw
> $ touch /bar_rw/bar
> touch: cannot touch `/bar_rw/bar': Read-only file system
>
> Ideally, the best solution to fix this is to move the RDONLY flag from
> its per-superblock basis to a per-mountpoint (vfsmount) basis. I do not
> know is there is a something that prevent that except that this implies
> many changes as many codes do not use macros but access s_flags directly.
>
> It seems quite clear that the superblock sharing couldn't be changed (to
> avoid incoherency, inode aliasing and so on...) ?
>
> Do you have a (better) solution ?
> I can help if needed.
>
>
> Cordially
>
--
Aurelien Degremont
CEA/DAM - DIF/DSSI/SISR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-15 10:37 NFS superblock sharing implies mount flags bug Aurelien Degremont
2006-03-20 13:20 ` Aurelien Degremont [this message]
2006-03-20 18:05 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=441EAC05.7020903@cea.fr \
--to=aurelien.degremont@cea.fr \
--cc=jc.lafoucriere@cea.fr \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.