From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Lifetime of flash memory
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:01:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44203179.3090606@comcast.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a kind of dumb question. I keep hearing that "USB Flash Memory"
or "Compact Flash Cards" and family have "a limited number of writes"
and will eventually wear out. Recommendations like "DO NOT PUT A SWAP
FILE ON USB MEMORY" have come out of this. In fact, quoting
Documentation/laptop-mode.txt:
* If you're worried about your data, you might want to consider using
a USB memory stick or something like that as a "working area". (Be
aware though that flash memory can only handle a limited number of
writes, and overuse may wear out your memory stick pretty quickly.
Do _not_ use journalling filesystems on flash memory sticks.)
The question I have is, is this really significant? I have heard quoted
that flash memory typically handles something like 3x10^18 writes; and
that compact flash cards, USB drives, SD cards, and family typically
have integrated control chipsets that include wear-leveling algorithms
(built-in flash like in an iPaq does not; hence jffs2). Should we
really care that in about 95 billion years the thing will wear out
(assuming we write its entire capacity once a second)?
I call FUD.
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Evil alien overlord from Blasto
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=48mD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 17:01 John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-03-21 17:14 ` Lifetime of flash memory David Vrabel
2006-03-21 17:28 ` John Richard Moser
2006-03-21 18:37 ` Paulo Marques
2006-03-21 18:00 ` hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
2006-03-21 18:20 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-03-21 18:40 ` John Richard Moser
2006-03-23 3:46 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-23 7:49 linux
2006-03-26 13:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-03-26 16:21 ` linux
2006-03-26 16:36 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-03-27 16:18 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-03-27 17:44 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-27 18:01 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-03-28 4:28 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 6:41 ` Magnus Damm
2006-03-28 8:58 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 12:55 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-28 13:27 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 13:35 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-29 1:01 ` linux
2006-03-29 4:33 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-29 15:56 ` linux
2006-03-30 6:33 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-30 11:23 ` linux
2006-03-30 12:18 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 0:21 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44203179.3090606@comcast.net \
--to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.