From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ICX
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 09:10:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4425022a-b23a-4424-97fc-caead3a626e2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895bfd3c-c8fc-423b-abd1-42553b74706c@intel.com>
On 5/20/2026 6:19 AM, Chen, Zide wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2026 11:11 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> Update perf hard-coded event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for
>> Icelake server according to the latest ICX perfmon events (v1.30).
> Nit: Ice Lake>
Sure. Thanks.
>> Since the value of cache extra registers differs with previous
>> generations, introduce new snc_hw_cache_extra_regs[] to represent the
>> value of extra registers on ICX.
>>
>> ICX perfmon events:
>> https://github.com/intel/perfmon/blob/main/ICX/events/icelakex_core.json
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
> Reviewed-by: zide.chen@intel.com
>
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 793335c3ce78..1390d1da985b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -310,10 +310,11 @@ static struct extra_reg intel_skl_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
>> static struct event_constraint intel_icl_event_constraints[] = {
>> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
>> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01c0, 0), /* old INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
>> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
>> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* pseudo INST_RETIRED.ANY */
>> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
>> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
>> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* SLOTS */
>> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0200, 1), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD */
>> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_TSC */
>> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* pseudo TOPDOWN.SLOTS */
>> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING, 0),
>> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC, 1),
>> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND, 2),
>> @@ -1019,6 +1020,41 @@ static __initconst const u64 skl_hw_cache_extra_regs
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static __initconst const u64 snc_hw_cache_extra_regs
>> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
>> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
>> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
>> +{
>> + [ C(LL ) ] = {
>> + [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.ANY_RESPONSE */
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3FBFC00001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.L3_MISS */
>> + },
>> + [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x3F3FFC0002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.ANY_RESPONSE */
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3F3FC00002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.L3_MISS */
>> + },
>> + [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
>> + },
>> + },
>> + [ C(NODE) ] = {
>> + [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.LOCAL_DRAM */
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x730000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.REMOTE_DRAM */
>> + },
>> + [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.LOCAL_DRAM */
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x730000002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.REMOTE_DRAM */
>> + },
>> + [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
>> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
>> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
>> + },
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> #define SNB_DMND_DATA_RD (1ULL << 0)
>> #define SNB_DMND_RFO (1ULL << 1)
>> #define SNB_DMND_IFETCH (1ULL << 2)
>> @@ -8119,17 +8155,19 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>>
>> case INTEL_ICELAKE_X:
>> case INTEL_ICELAKE_D:
>> + memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snc_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
>> x86_pmu.pebs_ept = 1;
>> pmem = true;
>> - fallthrough;
>> + goto snc_common;
>> case INTEL_ICELAKE_L:
>> case INTEL_ICELAKE:
>> case INTEL_TIGERLAKE_L:
>> case INTEL_TIGERLAKE:
>> case INTEL_ROCKETLAKE:
>> + memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
>> + snc_common:
>> x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
>> memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, skl_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
>> - memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, skl_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
>> hw_cache_event_ids[C(ITLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1;
>> intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl();
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 6:11 [PATCH 00/11] perf/x86/intel: Fix inaccurate hard-coded event configurations Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ICX Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:19 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 1:10 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor ICX tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SPR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:25 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 2:08 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor SPR tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for DMR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:19 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ADL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 7:11 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-19 22:26 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor ADL tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for MTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor MTL tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for LNL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor LNL tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ARL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 7:12 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor ARL tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for PTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for NVL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor NVL tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SRF Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:23 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 2:11 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor SRF tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for CWF Dapeng Mi
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regsfor CWF tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4425022a-b23a-4424-97fc-caead3a626e2@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.