From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser3 stable on 2.4.20?
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:43:44 -0800
Message-ID: <44283260.4090500@namesys.com>
References: <4426CF12.6050403@mid.email-server.info>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-28357-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <4426CF12.6050403@mid.email-server.info>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Alexander Skwar wrote:

>Hello!
>
>I've got a Linkstation II "NAS" device, which is running
>kernel 2.4.20 on a MIPS LE CPU.
>
>How stable was Reiser3 on kernel 2.4.20? Was it as trustworthy
>and good as it is nowadays on a 2.6.15 kernel?
>  
>
It was reasonable.  I think 2.4.17 was what got the last serious bugs. 
Don't use acls though.

>Thanks,
>
>Alexander Skwar
>  
>