From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:29:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44285929.4020806@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143489287.4970.76.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2006-03-27 at 09:43 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>>The fact is, BUS/ID/LUN crap really doesn't make sense for the majority of
>>devices out there. Never has, never will. The fact that old-fashioned SCSI
>>devices think of themselves that way has absolutely zero to do with
>>reality today.
>
>
> It is still a very visible reality if you work in a data centre or with
> server kit, or if you have tape arrays or multi-CD towers. The LUN or
> device number in particular are generally the number emblazoned on each
> slot in the unit and knowing the LUN reliably is sort of critical to not
> making embarrasing (and career limiting) screwups when swapping drives.
>
> Controller is a pretty abstract concept and except on arrays so is
> device, but both device and LUN do need to be accessible reliably for
> the hardware that thinks that way. What other hardware does is
> irrelevant and "-EINVAL" seems as good an answer as anything.
USB multi-card readers seem to like the concept of
LUNs as well.
Doug Gilbert
"What, never? Well, hardly ever." G+S HMS Pinafore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 19:28 [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi Bodo Eggert
2006-03-26 19:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-26 20:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 10:11 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-27 15:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-26 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-26 23:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-27 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 11:42 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-28 9:43 ` Matthias Andree
2006-03-27 15:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-27 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 17:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 19:54 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-27 21:29 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2006-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Richter
2006-03-28 14:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-26 23:09 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44285929.4020806@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.