From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser3 stable on 2.4.20?
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:58:51 -0800
Message-ID: <44296B4B.5040700@namesys.com>
References: <4426CF12.6050403@mid.email-server.info> <44283260.4090500@namesys.com> <200603281511.05199.rmeijer@internet.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-28380-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <200603281511.05199.rmeijer@internet.gr>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "Raymond A. Meijer" <rmeijer@internet.gr>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Raymond A. Meijer wrote:

>On Mon 27 Mar 2006 21:43, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>  
>
>>It was reasonable.  I think 2.4.17 was what got the last serious bugs.
>>Don't use acls though.
>>    
>>
>
>I think the only time I ever had serious problems (data loss) with ReiserFS 
>was with kernel 2.4.13 [sic].
>
>
>Ray
>
>
>  
>
The bugs fixed in 2.4.17 were fairly rare.  I don't remember what they
were, but they were real.