From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
roe@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Call get_time() only when necessary in run_hrtimer_queue
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:39:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442974BC.30304@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060328165127.GC10411@sgi.com>
Dimitri Sivanich a écrit :
>
> The hrtimer work in -mm does improve on the situation, although there
> appears to be some occasional cache line contention for xtime. The
> following patch (which is similiar to my previously submitted patch)
> is applicable to 2.6.16-mm1 and does take care of at least a good
> portion of that.
I am not sure your patch is correct.
>
> Index: linux/kernel/hrtimer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/hrtimer.c 2006-03-27 09:43:40.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux/kernel/hrtimer.c 2006-03-27 12:35:47.416054373 -0600
> @@ -604,14 +604,17 @@ int hrtimer_get_res(const clockid_t whic
> */
> static inline void run_hrtimer_queue(struct hrtimer_base *base)
> {
> - struct rb_node *node;
> + struct rb_node *node = base->first;
> +
> + if (!node)
> + return;
>
> if (base->get_softirq_time)
> base->softirq_time = base->get_softirq_time();
>
> spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
>
> - while ((node = base->first)) {
> + while (node) {
Are you sure of this change ?
base->first may have changed just before you locked the base->lock
(spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);)
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-28 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-24 17:51 [PATCH] Call get_time() only when necessary in run_hrtimer_queue Dimitri Sivanich
2006-03-24 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-25 7:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-03-28 16:51 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2006-03-28 17:39 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-03-28 17:55 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2006-03-28 19:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-03-28 20:14 ` [PATCH] Call get_softirq_time() only when necessary in run_hrtimer_queue() Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442974BC.30304@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roe@sgi.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.