Re: ALSA sample rate conversion and general performance improvements.

[James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>]

Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:03 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>   
>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>     
>>> At Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:24:20 +0100,
>>> James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have had some conversations with various people regarding some general
>>>> problems some audio developers have with the current ALSA sound model.
>>>>         
>
> Hi James. Not me by any chance? :)
>   
You were one of them yes. You seemed to explain it a bit better than 
other people have. I mulled over the ideas this weekend and decided that 
it would be a move in the right direction for ALSA. It would help us out 
with the current resampling problems. It might complicate error 
recovery, but I am sure we can overcome those in time. So long as we can 
still reliably detect xruns, I am all for the changes. Now, what to do 
after an xrun happens is quite another issue, but detection of it is 
certainly required.

James




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642