From: Amin Azez <azez@ufomechanic.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:31:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442B9765.2020105@ufomechanic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F4DBDF.9010008@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>(jiffies, tuples) would be unique even in that case.
>>>
>>>Thats true. But what is the advantage over using the counter?
>
>
> Actually it would still not be unique if connections live
> shorter than a jiffy and are resurrected.
In which case would there be any harm in it not being unqiue, if it were
the same connection resurrected, why try to avoid having the same id?
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-30 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-13 2:41 [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2006-02-13 11:20 ` Harald Welte
2006-02-16 8:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-16 8:47 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 9:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-16 9:11 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-16 9:36 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-16 20:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-02-17 8:18 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 8:45 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-02-17 9:30 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 18:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-04 16:23 ` Hashtrie testing (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2) Martin Josefsson
2006-03-05 9:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-05 13:24 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-04 20:11 ` Hashtrie testing2 " Martin Josefsson
2006-03-05 11:24 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-05 17:48 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-06 13:15 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-07 18:33 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-08 6:34 ` Patrick Schaaf
2006-03-12 18:49 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-14 11:35 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-23 11:27 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-23 21:07 ` Martin Josefsson
2006-03-25 8:39 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-28 12:26 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-30 8:28 ` Hashtrie testing2, dancing trees Amin Azez
2006-03-31 18:43 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-02-17 8:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2 Patrick McHardy
2006-03-30 8:31 ` Amin Azez [this message]
2006-03-31 1:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-03-31 18:35 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-03-31 18:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-01 19:31 ` Harald Welte
2006-04-06 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-11 16:09 ` Amin Azez
2006-04-11 16:17 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <443CA579.3030908@ufomechanic.net>
2006-04-12 18:30 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442B9765.2020105@ufomechanic.net \
--to=azez@ufomechanic.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.